The centre of your go-to-market strategy is not your products or services, but the problem that you solve with these products or services. The problem choice informs messaging, of course, but also market selection, the shape of your sales channel, and even the products or services themselves. So you need to get it ‘right’. How, though, can you make sure that your theoretically wonderful problem statement will stand up when exposed in the market? You need to ‘road test’ your language.
Not the problem you are in the business of solving – that’s a decision for your leadership team. What we’re talking about here is how you tell the story of that problem.
Here’s an example of a problem narrative that has been thoroughly tested. This might come across as indulgent – it’s about one of our service offerings – but bear with me here because a) this will likely land for you, and b) I can’t tell the story of our customers without permission.
“In their early steps along the journey, high-growth businesses need to preserve cash. They also need to stay super close to their customers to learn. For these reasons, DIY is a good setting for marketing. At a later stage, once revenues have hit $40m – $50m, these same businesses might have three in marketing (one senior) and five specialist agencies. They are ‘all set’. But what do you do in the middle? When you are big enough to need professional marketing but not yet big enough to resource it?”.
Clearly, that is a problem statement that leads to a conversation about outsourced marketing. Again, it is a bit self-serving to include it here, but I am sure that you get the idea.
Testing a problem statement with your B2B customers can be done in a few ways, ranging from a light touch to a deep, research-infused strategy. Regardless of depth, it’s vital to include both prompted and unprompted testing methods to gain genuine and insightful feedback. Let me show you a light version and a deeper one.
Path 1: the light and simple approach
This approach is designed for businesses aiming to get initial feedback without delving deeply into formal research. It typically involves casual conversations with a small number of familiar customers. Here’s how you can proceed:
- Clarify your problem statement: Begin with a clear and concise problem statement that outlines the issue at hand.
- Engage with friendlies – unprompted: Start with informal conversations with 3-4 friendly customers. Ask them to describe any problems they perceive “like this” without providing them with your specific narrative, to gather their unprompted views.
- Engage with friendlies – prompted: Following the unprompted feedback, share your problem narrative explicitly and seek their reactions to understand their prompted responses.
- Make adjustments based on feedback: Use the feedback from both unprompted and prompted engagements to iterate on your problem statement.
- Integration: Integrate the refined problem statement into initial solution development, keeping open channels for further feedback.
Path 2: the intensive research-driven approach
For those aiming to undertake a more rigorous analysis, this intensive path leverages both qualitative and quantitative research methods for a comprehensive understanding. This process involves the following steps:
- Clarify your problem statement: Ensure that your problem statement is well-defined, serving as the foundation for your research.
- Develop a hypothesis: Formulate a hypothesis or a set of assumptions related to your problem statement that is ready to be tested through research.
- Segment your audience: Identify different segments of your customer base to analyse varied responses to the problem statement.
- Choose the right methods: Select appropriate research methods, including surveys, interviews, and focus groups, to garner detailed insights from your customers.
- Conduct the research – unprompted: Initiate the research by asking participants to describe problems they perceive in the area of focus without providing them with your narrative, to collect unprompted insights.
- Conduct the research – prompted: Subsequently, share your problem narrative with the participants and gather their reactions to collect prompted insights.
- Analyse the data: Analyse the data from both unprompted and prompted sessions to uncover patterns, trends, and valuable insights.
- Make adjustments based on insights: Use the insights you garner to refine your problem statement, ensuring it resonates well with your customers’ actual experiences and needs.
- Validation: Validate the revised problem statement with a subset of customers to assess its effectiveness.
- Integration: Incorporate the validated problem statement into your business strategy, using it as a guiding light for your endeavours.
- Feedback loop: Establish a continuous feedback loop with your customers for ongoing insights and iterative improvements.
- Documentation and reporting: Document the process and outcomes, preparing a comprehensive report to share with your team and other stakeholders.
- Implementation: Use the refined problem statement to develop solutions and strategies that fully address the identified problem.
Additional tips:
- Pilot testing: Consider pilot testing solutions based on the refined problem statement with a small group of customers before a full-scale rollout.
- Feedback channels: Set up channels for ongoing feedback from your customers, encouraging a cycle of continuous refinement and improvement.
- Collaboration: Foster collaboration with customers during the problem-solving process, cultivating a sense of partnership and co-creation.
Whether you choose a lighter touch or a deeper dive, incorporating both prompted and unprompted testing methods will equip you with a well-rounded understanding of your B2B customers’ perspectives. This will help you hone your problem statement to better address real-world issues and facilitate successful solutions.
Author - Hugh Macfarlane
Hugh Macfarlane is founder and CEO of align.me. He's the author of 'The Leaky Funnel', and hundreds of video blogs, papers and ebooks and a handful of research reports on all things alignment.
